Rescuing Biomedical Research

Creative solutions to sustain biomedical research

  • Home
  • The Problem
  • RBR Actions
    • Actions taken
    • Work in progress
  • Resources
    • Articles
    • Books and Talks
    • Reports and Research Articles
    • Videos
    • Websites
  • About
    • Steering Committee Bios
    • Contact Us
    • In the Media
    • Site Map
  • Blog
You are here: Home / Blog / Women in the life sciences earn less than men

Women in the life sciences earn less than men

November 3, 2016 By RBR Writing Program

By Jennifer Nguyen

A gender gap in salaries persists across most career stages for those employed in the life sciences, according to the 2016 Life Sciences Salary Survey published this week. Average academic salaries in 2016 were similar to those in 2015, but breaking these data down by gender reveals a more nuanced story.

At the graduate-student level, women earn $7,000 more than men on average. Salaries are mostly equal for postdoctoral scholars and research assistants, but a gender gap becomes apparent at the assistant and full-professor levels with women averaging $13,000 less than men.

Breaking the life sciences down into subfields, the survey found that wages varied depending on area of specialization, with biotechnology wages at the top, averaging over $124,000. Further breaking down each specialization by gender revealed that women make up less than 40 percent of fields with higher average wages like biotechnology, bioinformatics and drug development/discovery. Conversely, genetics, virology and molecular biology had some of the lowest wages in the survey and women represented more than 55 percent of each field. It is not clear from these data whether women occupy intrinsically low-paying fields, or if women are generally paid less, thereby lowering the wage of the field.

Corroborating this survey is a 2016 study that found that women in science, technology, engineering and math are paid 31 percent less than men one year after receiving their Ph.D. Importantly, this study demonstrates men earn 11 percent more than women after controlling for the field of specialization. This difference is attributed to whether women were married and had children. Childless women have a smaller wage gap with men than married women with children. Married men and women with children were equally represented in the study but women with children were the ones with lower salaries.

It is not clear if a skewed geographic distribution of women in the life sciences can partly address the gender salary gap. For example, if women disproportionately take jobs in areas with lower costs-of-living, and therefore generally lower salaries, this may be partly to blame for the wage gap. Nevertheless, all of the underlying biases contributing to the gender wage gap need to be addressed. Organizations like the Association for Women in Science and the American Association of University Women have materials to help close the wage gap.

Be sure to follow the RBR blog for updates on critical issues facing the biomedical research enterprise!

—

nguyenJennifer Nguyen advocates for better training programs for young researchers and is interested in raising awareness of scientific research to the general public and making science accessible to everyone. She received her PhD in Biology at Tufts University and is currently a Science Specialist and Instructor at the Innovation Institute in Newton, MA.

The RBR Writing Program is intended to help graduate students and postdocs receive policy writing experience. For more information, contact RBR Director Chris Pickett.

Filed Under: Blog Tagged With: biomedical research enterprise, diversity, gender

Get the RBR blog in your inbox!

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

iBiology Videos: The Biomedical Workforce

  • See more videos >>

Most Recent Input

Click on a blue header below to see the full comment.

Comments by Andrea Repetto

Posted: November 3, 2016

Non-PhD level positions undervalued

Comments by Andrea Repetto

Posted: November 3, 2016

Reward negative results

Comments by Holly Hamilton

Posted: September 13, 2016

(1) The training model thus far is that of the medieval apprentice- a trainee is to become a clone of his/her supervisor. (2) Trainees are rarely permitted to conduct work not expressly assigned/approved by supervisor. (3) Training goals for postdocs at a national level are unspecified. (4) All postdocs are trained as if they will become academic research professors.

See all input >>

Upcoming Events

 
See upcoming events, or submit an event
to be listed >>

© 2021 Rescuing BioMedical Research · All Rights Reserved · About · Contact Us