Rescuing Biomedical Research

Creative solutions to sustain biomedical research

  • Home
  • The Problem
  • RBR Actions
    • Actions taken
    • Work in progress
    • Writing Program
  • Resources
    • Articles
    • Books and Talks
    • Reports and Research Articles
    • Videos
    • Websites
  • About
    • Steering Committee Bios
    • Contact Us
    • In the Media
    • Site Map
  • Blog
You are here: Home / Blog / Expanding support and implementing new teaching strategies to broaden diversity in biomedical research

Expanding support and implementing new teaching strategies to broaden diversity in biomedical research

June 1, 2017 By Chris Pickett

An RBR Writing Program post by Sophia Kaska

A sustainable biomedical research enterprise must be diverse along any number of axes, including racial, ethnic, gender and socioeconomic lines. The 2011 Expanding Underrepresented Minority Participation: America’s Science and Technology Talent at the Crossroads from the National Academies laid out recommendations to improve diversity and inclusion in American research. However, progress in implementing these recommendations has been slow.

Freeman Hrabowski and Peter Henderson, two of the authors of the 2011 NAS study, recently explored the University of Maryland-Baltimore County as an example of specific implementable actions that could be taken to improve diversity and inclusion. They argue two practices are essential to successfully increasing the pool of underrepresented students pursuing professional degrees. First, support a student’s overall success by expanding financial support of education, access to tutoring and professional development. Second, employing teaching strategies, such as problem-based learning or team-based learning to promote concept retention, that encourage students from all backgrounds to persist in STEM fields.

Implementing new methods and programs does come with challenges. There is a substantial financial component that universities must commit to make these programs successful. Universities would need to reformat curricula and hire faculty and staff well-versed in pedagogies that foster student retention in the sciences. Training such instructors takes time and could present an impediment to diversification. However, for schools that are able to implement such a system, an institution may expect an increase in the number of students entering STEM fields and a decrease in their course failure rate.

Federal agencies have taken some steps to improve diversity and inclusion in the research enterprise. The National Institutes of Health’s Building Infrastructure Leading to Diversity and the National Science Foundation’s Inclusion across the Nation of Communities of Learners of Underrepresented Discoverers in Engineering and Science program are taking steps to address diversity and inclusion issues, but more must be done. Increasing racial diversity within STEM fields is necessary and beneficial for sustaining the biomedical research enterprise. The obstacles to implementing programs that enhance diversity can be overcome with time, strategic planning, commitment and vision. By building a more diverse workforce, the biomedical research enterprise will become more sustainable and “the country will succeed in realizing the economic, security and health goals the American people prize.”

—

Sophia Kaska is passionate about communicating science with the public through outreach and education and seeks to empower fellow scientists to advocate for sustaining biomedical research. Sophia is currently completing her Ph.D. at Michigan State University in Pharmacology and Toxicology and Environmental Toxicology. Sophia is on Twitter as @sophia_kaska and can be contacted by e-mail: kaskasop@msu.edu.

The RBR Writing Program is intended to help graduate students and postdocs receive policy writing experience. For more information, contact RBR Director Chris Pickett.

Filed Under: Blog Tagged With: diversity, graduate students, RBR Writing Program

Get the RBR blog in your inbox!

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

iBiology Videos: The Biomedical Workforce

  • See more videos >>

Most Recent Input

Click on a blue header below to see the full comment.

Comments by Andrea Repetto

Posted: November 3, 2016

Non-PhD level positions undervalued

0 comments

Comments by Andrea Repetto

Posted: November 3, 2016

Reward negative results

0 comments

Comments by Holly Hamilton

Posted: September 13, 2016

(1) The training model thus far is that of the medieval apprentice- a trainee is to become a clone of his/her supervisor. (2) Trainees are rarely permitted to conduct work not expressly assigned/approved by supervisor. (3) Training goals for postdocs at a national level are unspecified. (4) All postdocs are trained as if they will become academic research professors.

0 comments

See all input >>

Upcoming Events

 
See upcoming events, or submit an event
to be listed >>

© 2018 Rescuing BioMedical Research · All Rights Reserved · About · Contact Us